linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86/iommu: use bit structures for context

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52CFA140.5060700@hp.com>
Date:	Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:29:04 +0800
From:	"Li, ZhenHua" <zhen-hual@...com>
To:	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
CC:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86/iommu: use bit structures for context_entry

I have not seen such a bug yet . but obviously a '=' should be used when 
you want to set a value.

for example, if x != 0,
	x=10
and
	x|=10
will cause different result.

ZhenHua

On 01/07/2014 10:41 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 04:45:01PM +0800, Li, Zhen-Hua wrote:
>> There is a structure named context_entry used by intel iommu, and there
>> are some bit operations on it. Use bit structure may make these operations
>> easy.
>> Also the function context_set_address_root may cause problem because it uses
>>   |= operation, not set the new value. And this patch can fix it.
>
> What is the problem you are trying to fix here? Is it an actual bug?
>
>
> 	Joerg
>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/