linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: OMAPFB: panel-sony-acx565akm: fix missing mutex unlocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52D3BE08.9040508@ti.com>
Date:	Mon, 13 Jan 2014 12:20:56 +0200
From:	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
To:	Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>
CC:	<plagnioj@...osoft.com>, <pali.rohar@...il.com>, <pavel@....cz>,
	<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ivaylo Dimitrov <freemangordon@....bg>,
	Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: OMAPFB: panel-sony-acx565akm: fix missing mutex
 unlocks

On 2014-01-11 11:39, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:

> The patch does not apply cleanly on top of rc7, however I applied it by
> hand. So far it seems it fixes the issue brought by
> c37dd677988ca50bc8bc60ab5ab053720583c168, though I didn't test if
> mutex_lock/mutex_unlock are complementary in every code path (at least
> not explicitly, I guess maemo is doing it for us anyway :) ).

Ok, thanks.

> So, shall I send a patch incorporating your code changes, or you will do
> it?

I can handle it.

 Tomi



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (902 bytes)