linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: OMAPFB: panel-sony-acx565akm: fix missing mutex unlocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 25 Dec 2015 15:29:23 +0200
From:	Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>
To:	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
Cc:	plagnioj@...osoft.com, pali.rohar@...il.com, pavel@....cz,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ivaylo Dimitrov <freemangordon@....bg>,
	Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: OMAPFB: panel-sony-acx565akm: fix missing mutex
 unlocks


Hi Tomi,

On 13.01.2014 12:20, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 2014-01-11 11:39, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
>
>> The patch does not apply cleanly on top of rc7, however I applied it by
>> hand. So far it seems it fixes the issue brought by
>> c37dd677988ca50bc8bc60ab5ab053720583c168, though I didn't test if
>> mutex_lock/mutex_unlock are complementary in every code path (at least
>> not explicitly, I guess maemo is doing it for us anyway :) ).
>
> Ok, thanks.
>
>> So, shall I send a patch incorporating your code changes, or you will do
>> it?
>
> I can handle it.
>
>   Tomi
>
>

I still don't see those fixes in mainline, shall I send a patch?

Ivo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/