[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140113183555.GA14125@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 19:35:55 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] lockdep: Kill held_lock->check and "int check" arg
of __lock_acquire()
On 01/12, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 06:45:32PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > But could someone please explain me what should lockdep_no_validate
> > actually do? 1704f47b5 "lockdep: Add novalidate class for dev->mutex
> > conversion" doesn't tell which kind of warnings it tries to avoid,
> > and it looks buggy (see another email from me).
>
> It should disable lock-order checks for the locks that set that as
> class. So we can still do the simple checks like detect if we free
> memory with a held lock in and make sure we do not return to userspace
> with a held lock; but the class should not participate in the lock
> graph.
Yes, this is what I more or less understood, but I was confused anyway.
Somehow I thought that this patch tries to suppress the warnings caused
by rw_semaphore -> mutex conversion, and I was completely puzzled. But
3142788b79 "drivers/base: Convert dev->sem to mutex" actually did the
semaphore -> mutex change!
Everything is clear now, thanks!
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists