[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871u0bbfnd.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 08:55:50 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Rodrigo Campos <rodrigo@...g.com.ar>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/28] perf report: Cache cumulative callchains
Hi Jiri,
Thanks for reminding me. :)
On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 19:06:28 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 05:46:15PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
[SNIP]
>> + /*
>> + * Check if there's duplicate entries in the callchain.
>> + * It's possible that it has cycles or recursive calls.
>> + */
>> + for (i = 0; i < iter->curr; i++) {
>> + if (hist_entry__cmp(he_cache[i], &he_tmp) == 0)
>
> we need here:
> iter->he = he_cache[i];
>
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>
> otherwise iter->he and al are not in sync and
> hist_entry__inc_addr_samples fails in hist_iter_cb
Right. But the point of the he_cache is to skip duplicate entries. So
I'd like to change it like setting it to NULL and check it before the
callback function:
while (iter->next_entry(iter, al)) {
err = iter->add_next_entry(iter, al);
if (err)
break;
if (iter->he && iter->add_entry_cb) {
err = iter->add_entry_cb(iter, al, ...);
if (err)
break;
}
}
What do you think?
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists