[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52D4A00D.8000702@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 18:25:17 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/15] clk: Allow drivers to pass in a regmap
On 01/09/14 23:05, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> It feels another key point is being missed though. The regmap
> pointer and the enable_reg/enable_mask is embedded in clk_hw to
> allow the same code to be used by different types of surrounding
> structs. Each struct: clk_pll, clk_rcg, and clk_branch in this
> series use the regmap interface to enable/disable the clock and
> they can easily do so by passing something that's always
> available from struct clk_hw (be it via a wrapper struct, private
> data member, or addition of new fields to clk_hw). If the regmap
> members move into each specific type of clock we can't just pass
> a single pointer to the enable/disable regmap functions anymore.
> This is the reason why I suggested a driver data pointer or
> container struct so that everything regmap related is contained
> within one type.
>
Any thoughts?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists