linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: single: fix pcs_disable with bits_per

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 15 Jan 2014 08:31:11 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...aro.org>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: single: fix pcs_disable with bits_per_mux

On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com> wrote:

> pcs_enable() uses vals->mask instead of pcs->fmask when bits_per_mux is
> enabled. However, pcs_disable() always uses pcs->fmask.
>
> Fix pcs_disable() to use vals->mask with bits_per_mux.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
> Acked-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>

Patch applied. However make sure to CC Haojian on such patches as
he's using it on a non-OMAP system and often has good feedback.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/