[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140115185621.GL15567@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 18:56:21 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@...e.fr>
Cc: Xiubo Li <Li.Xiubo@...escale.com>, lgirdwood@...il.com,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
Subject: Re: Problems with simple-card
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 07:18:31PM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> The main problem is about sysclk: when there is no clock in the DT,
> you get the clock of the CPU or CODEC DAI. In my system, two clocks
> are declared in the controller CPU DAI, but there is no .set_sysclk
> pointer. So, snd_soc_dai_set_sysclk() returns -EINVAL and the card is
> not created.
set_sysclk() should be returning -ENOTSUPP in this case as with
set_fmt() and the generic code then ignoring that error.
> As I don't know why you need these fmt and sysclk, may you have a
> look at these problems?
The overwhelming majority of combinations of devices need a format
specifying (usually one will be imposed by the system design even if
both devices could be master).
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists