[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87sisq9fa5.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:58:58 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: perf probe: Build error with missing libraries
Hi Arnaldo,
On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 10:09:07 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:41:37AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
>> (2014/01/14 3:14), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> > Jiri, this is something else for the give-me-more-ponies list for
>> > tests/make: build it on freshly provisioned systems with multiple mixes
>> > of devel packages installed ;-)
>
>> I think we can change makefile to get some combinations of config options
>> when building perf tools.
>
> This is what:
>
> make -C tools/perf -f tests/make
>
> does, and we use it already, many config combos are tested, but that
> kinda expects that all optional devel libs be installed.
I've been thinking that the above should look like below.
make build-test (-C tools/perf)
Maybe something like this?
diff --git a/tools/perf/Makefile b/tools/perf/Makefile
index eefb9fb0c02f..e110c2a2ade1 100644
--- a/tools/perf/Makefile
+++ b/tools/perf/Makefile
@@ -75,6 +75,12 @@ clean:
$(make)
#
+# The build-test target is not really parallel, don't print the jobs info:
+#
+build-test:
+ @$(MAKE) -f tests/make --no-print-directory
+
+#
# All other targets get passed through:
#
%:
--
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists