lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 15 Jan 2014 15:38:56 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: perf probe: Build error with missing libraries

Em Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:58:58AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> Hi Arnaldo,
> 
> On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 10:09:07 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:41:37AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> >> (2014/01/14 3:14), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >> > Jiri, this is something else for the give-me-more-ponies list for
> >> > tests/make: build it on freshly provisioned systems with multiple mixes
> >> > of devel packages installed ;-)
> >  
> >> I think we can change makefile to get some combinations of config options
> >> when building perf tools.
> >
> > This is what:
> >
> >  make -C tools/perf -f tests/make
> >
> > does, and we use it already, many config combos are tested, but that
> > kinda expects that all optional devel libs be installed.
> 
> I've been thinking that the above should look like below.
> 
>   make build-test (-C tools/perf)
> 
> 
> Maybe something like this?

Haven't tested, but I think it is worth to make this a shortcut, care to
test (if not yet) and resubmit with proper S-O-B, etc?

- Arnaldo
 
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/Makefile b/tools/perf/Makefile
> index eefb9fb0c02f..e110c2a2ade1 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/perf/Makefile
> @@ -75,6 +75,12 @@ clean:
>  	$(make)
>  
>  #
> +# The build-test target is not really parallel, don't print the jobs info:
> +#
> +build-test:
> +	@$(MAKE) -f tests/make --no-print-directory
> +
> +#
>  # All other targets get passed through:
>  #
>  %:
> 
> -- 
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ