[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874n5490p4.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:26:15 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: perf probe: Build error with missing libraries
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 15:38:56 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:58:58AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
>> Hi Arnaldo,
>>
>> On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 10:09:07 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> > Em Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:41:37AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
>> >> (2014/01/14 3:14), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> >> > Jiri, this is something else for the give-me-more-ponies list for
>> >> > tests/make: build it on freshly provisioned systems with multiple mixes
>> >> > of devel packages installed ;-)
>> >
>> >> I think we can change makefile to get some combinations of config options
>> >> when building perf tools.
>> >
>> > This is what:
>> >
>> > make -C tools/perf -f tests/make
>> >
>> > does, and we use it already, many config combos are tested, but that
>> > kinda expects that all optional devel libs be installed.
>>
>> I've been thinking that the above should look like below.
>>
>> make build-test (-C tools/perf)
>>
>>
>> Maybe something like this?
>
> Haven't tested, but I think it is worth to make this a shortcut, care to
> test (if not yet) and resubmit with proper S-O-B, etc?
OK, will do!
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists