| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <878uue1hh8.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 12:27:47 -0800 From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> Cc: "Dorau\, Lukasz" <lukasz.dorau@...el.com>, "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-scsi\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, sebastian.riemer@...fitbricks.com, richard.weinberger@...il.com Subject: Re: Why is (2 < 2) true? Is it a gcc bug? Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> writes: > > disable Value Range Propagation pass: > -fdisable-tree-vrp1 -fdisable-tree-vrp2 > > and complete unroll pass: > -fdisable-tree-cunrolli Can you file a gcc bug with test case? -Andi -- ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists