[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140117203444.GA16396@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:34:44 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCHv2 2/2] Change khugepaged to respect MMF_THP_DISABLE
flag
On 01/16, Alex Thorlton wrote:
>
> static inline int khugepaged_test_exit(struct mm_struct *mm)
> {
> - return atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) == 0;
> + return atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) == 0 ||
> + (mm->flags & MMF_THP_DISABLE_MASK);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
test_bit(MMF_THP_DISABLE) ?
And I am not sure this and another check in transparent_hugepage_enabled
is actually right...
I think that MMF_THP_DISABLE_MASK should not disable thp if this
vma has VM_HUGEPAGE set, iow perhaps madvise() should work even
after PR_SET_THP_DISABLE?
IOW, MMF_THP_DISABLE should act as khugepaged_req_madv().
But again, I won't argue.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists