linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/6] cgroup: make CONFIG_NET_CLS_CGROUP and CONFIG_NETPRIO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140118152813.GG3640@htj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Sat, 18 Jan 2014 10:28:13 -0500
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Cc:	Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] cgroup: make CONFIG_NET_CLS_CGROUP and
 CONFIG_NETPRIO_CGROUP bool instead of tristate

On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 04:26:24PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> >Unless there's gonna be another rc, I think it's already a bit too
> >late for 3.14 anyway.  I'll drop the net_cls part and rebase the
> >changes on top of rc1 later on.
> 
> I think that's 1 patch of your series, right?

They overlap.

> I think this one could still go through net-next if you want, that would
> avoid a merge conflict.

If there's gonna be another rc, I'll prolly just cherry-pick the
commit from net-next and then rebase the rest on top of it.  If there
isn't gonna be another rc, I'm just gonna base everything on v3.14-rc1
which would include the patch from net-next.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/