[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52DA9DDB.407@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 16:29:31 +0100
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] cgroup: make CONFIG_NET_CLS_CGROUP and CONFIG_NETPRIO_CGROUP
bool instead of tristate
On 01/18/2014 04:28 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 04:26:24PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>> Unless there's gonna be another rc, I think it's already a bit too
>>> late for 3.14 anyway. I'll drop the net_cls part and rebase the
>>> changes on top of rc1 later on.
>>
>> I think that's 1 patch of your series, right?
>
> They overlap.
>
>> I think this one could still go through net-next if you want, that would
>> avoid a merge conflict.
>
> If there's gonna be another rc, I'll prolly just cherry-pick the
> commit from net-next and then rebase the rest on top of it. If there
> isn't gonna be another rc, I'm just gonna base everything on v3.14-rc1
> which would include the patch from net-next.
Ok, sounds good.
Thanks Tejun.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists