linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4 v3] mfd: tc3589x: Add device tree bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdZoEwgRALT0R8vWB1aWxR_WCR2U0b1yF0Mr0qNm0LDGug@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 21 Jan 2014 14:35:52 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4 v3] mfd: tc3589x: Add device tree bindings

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:

> This defines the device tree bindings for the Toshiba TC3589x
> series of multi-purpose expanders. Only the stuff I can test
> is defined: GPIO and keypad. Others may implement more
> subdevices further down the road.
>
> This is to complement
> commit a435ae1d51e2f18414f2a87219fdbe068231e692
> "mfd: Enable the tc3589x for Device Tree" which left off
> the definition of the device tree bindings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> ---
> ChangeLog v2->v3:
> - Fix the keys/rows bindings to be u32 rather than
>   /bits/ 8, inconsistency noted by Mark Rutland.
> ChangeLog v1->v2:
> - Include a verbose example in the DT bindings.
> - Explain why this is a stand-alone bindings patch.

So will this since Nov 12 uncommented-upon patch be merged or
do you want me to do some change?

There was some back-and-forth regarding the (existing, already
in use) linux-specific input bindings but the only thing I can
see is some back and forth leaning toward just letting these
be used.

I am happy to change this in whatever way but no directions
for two months....

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/