linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4 v3] mfd: tc3589x: Add device tree bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140121171313.GC27111@lee--X1>
Date:	Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:13:13 +0000
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4 v3] mfd: tc3589x: Add device tree bindings

> > This defines the device tree bindings for the Toshiba TC3589x
> > series of multi-purpose expanders. Only the stuff I can test
> > is defined: GPIO and keypad. Others may implement more
> > subdevices further down the road.
> >
> > This is to complement
> > commit a435ae1d51e2f18414f2a87219fdbe068231e692
> > "mfd: Enable the tc3589x for Device Tree" which left off
> > the definition of the device tree bindings.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > ChangeLog v2->v3:
> > - Fix the keys/rows bindings to be u32 rather than
> >   /bits/ 8, inconsistency noted by Mark Rutland.
> > ChangeLog v1->v2:
> > - Include a verbose example in the DT bindings.
> > - Explain why this is a stand-alone bindings patch.
> 
> So will this since Nov 12 uncommented-upon patch be merged or
> do you want me to do some change?
> 
> There was some back-and-forth regarding the (existing, already
> in use) linux-specific input bindings but the only thing I can
> see is some back and forth leaning toward just letting these
> be used.

We still need a DT Ack.

> I am happy to change this in whatever way but no directions
> for two months....

If it had slipped though the gaps, I'd probably suggest poking or
re-sending before the middle of the merge-window though.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/