[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzAHNybM9bqb1gxAeOw-+z8=kSQvgwMDoUL3kXVfhcn8w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 09:15:01 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>
Cc: LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT] Security subsystem changes for 3.14
Since I got a conflict on this one and had to look at the code:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 5:11 AM, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org> wrote:
>
> Peter Huewe (5):
> tpm/tpm_ppi: Check return value of acpi_get_name
that commit looks wrong (and mainline had fixed it correctly in the meantime).
The problem with
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+ return status;
is that this is a callback for acpi_walk_namespace(), and returning a
failure status means that the walk will be interrupted.
So you actually want to return AE_OK if the acpi_get_name() call
fails, because that just skips the failing node. Returning failure
will skip *all* the nodes.
In practice it probably doesn't matter (acpi_get_name() isn't supposed
to fail), but I thought I'd point it out since I had to stare at the
conflict.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists