[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52E02DCC.1000404@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 13:45:00 -0700
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gnurou@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ARM: tegra: cpuidle: use firmware call for power
down
On 01/21/2014 03:10 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> Invoke the do_idle() firmware call before suspending a CPU so that the
> underlying firmware (if any) can take necessary action.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/cpuidle-tegra114.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/cpuidle-tegra114.c
> @@ -45,6 +46,8 @@ static int tegra114_idle_power_down(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>
> clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_ENTER, &dev->cpu);
>
> + call_firmware_op(do_idle);
> +
> cpu_suspend(0, tegra30_sleep_cpu_secondary_finish);
>
> clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_EXIT, &dev->cpu);
Don't you need to have the kernel also *not* do something when entering
idle; doesn't the FW op replace some of the register writes that the
kernel would otherwise be doing?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists