linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] ARM: firmware: improvements to Trusted Foundations support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 22 Jan 2014 13:47:07 -0700
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC:	Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gnurou@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ARM: firmware: improvements to Trusted Foundations
 support

On 01/21/2014 03:10 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> These (mostly minor) patches fix a few typos, improve points that
> were agreed upon when the Trusted Foundation series was initially
> submitted, and more importantly add support for the do_idle() firmware
> operation that is needed for cpuidle to be supported. Tegra's cpuidle
> driver is also updated accordingly.
> 
> These patches should be the last step before the device trees for NVIDIA
> SHIELD and Tegra Note 7 can be submitted.

Russell, once these patches are reviewed, should Alex submit them to the
ARM patch tracker, or will you Ack them so they can go through the Tegra
tree? Either way I can put them in a separate branch based on 3.14-rc1
in order to easily resolve any conflicts.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/