[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140122222701.4c44b08d@tor.valhalla.alchemy.lu>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 22:27:01 +0100
From: Joakim Hernberg <jbh@...hemy.lu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.12.6-rt9
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014 21:17:36 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> I happen to have a i7 box to test on, and sure enough, the latest
> 3.12-rt locks up on boot and reverting the
> timers-do-not-raise-softirq-unconditionally.patch, it boots fine.
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>
> diff --git a/kernel/timer.c b/kernel/timer.c
> index 46467be..8212c10 100644
> --- a/kernel/timer.c
> +++ b/kernel/timer.c
> @@ -1464,13 +1464,11 @@ void run_local_timers(void)
> raise_softirq(TIMER_SOFTIRQ);
> return;
> }
> - if (!base->active_timers)
> - goto out;
>
> /* Check whether the next pending timer has expired */
> if (time_before_eq(base->next_timer, jiffies))
> raise_softirq(TIMER_SOFTIRQ);
> -out:
> +
> rt_spin_unlock_after_trylock_in_irq(&base->lock);
>
> }
This fixes the problem on my i7-2600k.
--
Joakim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists