[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52E24C58.2000205@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 12:19:52 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.12.6-rt9
On 01/21/2014 03:17 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>
> diff --git a/kernel/timer.c b/kernel/timer.c
> index 46467be..8212c10 100644
> --- a/kernel/timer.c
> +++ b/kernel/timer.c
> @@ -1464,13 +1464,11 @@ void run_local_timers(void)
> raise_softirq(TIMER_SOFTIRQ);
> return;
> }
> - if (!base->active_timers)
> - goto out;
>
> /* Check whether the next pending timer has expired */
> if (time_before_eq(base->next_timer, jiffies))
> raise_softirq(TIMER_SOFTIRQ);
Hmmm. If active_timers is 0 and "time_before_eq(base->next_timer,
jiffies))" is true than that timer should have been initialized with
init_timer_deferrable() or we have a serious bug here where
active_timers isn't properly synchronized anymore.
Now. If there is really just a deferrable timer that expired and nothing
else then this would explain it.
> -out:
> +
> rt_spin_unlock_after_trylock_in_irq(&base->lock);
>
> }
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists