linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] numa, mem-hotplug: Fix stack overflow in numa when seting kernel nodes to unhotpluggable.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140123060109.GA15206@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 23 Jan 2014 01:01:09 -0500
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To:	Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com,
	guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] numa, mem-hotplug: Fix stack overflow in numa when
 seting kernel nodes to unhotpluggable.

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 01:49:28PM +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
 
 > This doesn't always happen. According to Dave, this happened once
 > in about five boots. The backtrace is like the following:
 > 
 > dump_stack
 > panic
 > ? numa_clear_kernel_node_hotplug
 > __stack_chk_fail
 > numa_clear_kernel_node_hotplug
 > ? memblock_search_pfn_nid
 > ? __early_pfn_to_nid
 > numa_init
 > x86_numa_init
 > initmem_init
 > setup_arch
 > start_kernel
 > 
 > This patch fix this problem by defining numa_kernel_nodes as a
 > static global variable in __initdata area.
 > 
 > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
 > index 81b2750..ebefeb7 100644
 > --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
 > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
 > @@ -562,10 +562,10 @@ static void __init numa_init_array(void)
 >  	}
 >  }
 >  
 > +static nodemask_t numa_kernel_nodes __initdata;
 >  static void __init numa_clear_kernel_node_hotplug(void)
 >  {
 >  	int i, nid;
 > -	nodemask_t numa_kernel_nodes;
 >  	unsigned long start, end;
 >  	struct memblock_type *type = &memblock.reserved;

I'm surprised that this worked for anyone.
By my math, nodemask_t is 1024 longs, which should fill the whole stack.

Any idea why it only broke sometimes ?

There are other on-stack nodemask_t's in the tree too, why are they safe ?

	Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/