linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] numa, mem-hotplug: Fix stack overflow in numa when seting kernel nodes to unhotpluggable.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 22 Jan 2014 22:05:20 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	davej@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
	hpa@...or.com, zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com, guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com,
	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] numa, mem-hotplug: Fix stack overflow in numa when
 seting kernel nodes to unhotpluggable.

On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:49:28 +0800 Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com> wrote:

> Dave found that the kernel will hang during boot. This is because
> the nodemask_t type stack variable numa_kernel_nodes is large enough
> to overflow the stack.
> 
> This doesn't always happen. According to Dave, this happened once
> in about five boots. The backtrace is like the following:
> 
> dump_stack
> panic
> ? numa_clear_kernel_node_hotplug
> __stack_chk_fail
> numa_clear_kernel_node_hotplug
> ? memblock_search_pfn_nid
> ? __early_pfn_to_nid
> numa_init
> x86_numa_init
> initmem_init
> setup_arch
> start_kernel
> 
> This patch fix this problem by defining numa_kernel_nodes as a
> static global variable in __initdata area.
> 
> ...
>
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> @@ -562,10 +562,10 @@ static void __init numa_init_array(void)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static nodemask_t numa_kernel_nodes __initdata;
>  static void __init numa_clear_kernel_node_hotplug(void)
>  {
>  	int i, nid;
> -	nodemask_t numa_kernel_nodes;
>  	unsigned long start, end;
>  	struct memblock_type *type = &memblock.reserved;

Seems odd.  The maximum size of a nodemask_t is 128 bytes, isn't it? 
If so, what the heck have we done in there to consume so much stack?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/