linux-kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+V-a8t5PWv95mr3VCjRamC4gJFLJbh=K+ZA81uEeMfGh7k-1A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 23 Jan 2014 14:36:05 +0530
From:	Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...aro.org>, broonie@...nel.org
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: 

Hi Mark,

I see a issue with one of the davinci boards, where regulator_get() fails
from this patch "regulator: core: Provide a dummy regulator with full
constraints".
as I see regulator_get() supports dummy regulators by default.

So currently I am booting it traditional way (NON DT way) and
regulator_dev_lookup()
fails (return NULL)  and for this check it fails.

+    if (ret && ret != -ENODEV) {
         regulator = ERR_PTR(ret);
         goto out;
     }
In the NON-DT case the 'ret' is never updated in regulator_dev_lookup().

I tried adding regulator_has_full_constraints(); call in .init_machine
but results
the same. Any pointer would be helpfull.

Thanks,
--Prabhakar Lad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/