[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140123171436.GA27345@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 18:14:36 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
Cc: "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tom Gundersen <teg@...m.no>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] x86: sysfb: remove sysfb when probing real hw
* David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com> wrote:
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_SYSFB
> >> +# include <asm/sysfb.h>
> >> +#endif
> >
> > I guess a single space is sufficient?
> >
> > Better yet, I'd include sysfb.h unconditionally:
>
> Unconditionally won't work as only x86 has this header. [...]
Well, in non-x86 code an #ifdef x86 looks ugly as well - but I guess
better than not building.
> [...] If there's a way to place a dummy into asm-generic which is
> picked if arch/xy/include/asm/ doesn't have the header, let me know.
Not that I know of.
> But if I include it unconditionally without any fallback, this will
> fail on non-x86. And adding the header to all archs seems overkill.
So why not drop the x86-ism and rename it to CONFIG_PLATFORM_SYSFB?
Some platforms configure it, some don't. Then the prototypes could
move into include/linux/sysfb.h or so and would be platform agnostic.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists