[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140124105952.GD4101@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 05:59:52 -0500
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, mingo@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
patches@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpusets: Allocate heap only when required
Hey,
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 02:51:12AM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> Nobody is depending on shit, the patch is removing a completely pointless
> memory allocation in braindead cpuset code. What you think is "harmful"
> or "more harmful" is irrelevant, but nobody said anything about depending
> on that behavior to do anything.
Weren't you talking something of that effect in memcg? Or was it
Michal? At any rate, I think you're missing the point why Li replied
that it's harmless. He, I think, meant that it doesn't make any
semantical difference to userland, so your reply saying that it's not
harmless listing the failure mode under memory pressure seemed
misleading, so I thought clarification was necessary. Probably my
(false?) memory of you talking about that contributed. Anyways, we
agree. Don't depend on it.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists