[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52E6954F.2060303@nod.at>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 18:20:15 +0100
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Cong Ding <dinggnu@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>,
Michael Davidson <md@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/kaslr for v3.14
Am 27.01.2014 18:05, schrieb Kees Cook:
> I would argue that decoding a non-panic oops on a running system is
> entirely possible as-is, since the offset can be found from
> /proc/kallsyms as root. It was the dead system that needed the offset
> exported: via text in the panic, or via an ELF note in a core.
The problem is that you have to pickup information from two sources.
As a kernel developer users/customers often show you a backtrace (oops or panic)
and want you do find the problem.
They barley manage it copy&paste the topmost full trace from dmesg or /var/log/messages.
If I have to ask them a bit later to tell me the offset from /proc/kallsyms or something else
I'm lost. Mostly because they have already rebooted the box...
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists