[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140127185031.GA28910@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:50:31 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Wei Ni <wni@...dia.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
LM Sensors <lm-sensors@...sensors.org>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] lm90 driver no longer working on PCs in 3.13
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:19:24AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 01/26/2014 04:51 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 02:04:06PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >
> >> I think I have a better idea: Surround the regulator code, or at least
> >> its error handling, in the lm90 driver with
> >
> >> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)) {
> >> }
> >
> >> Would that be ok ? If yes I'll submit a patch. I'll do the same in
> >> another driver I am working on.
> >
> > That's not going to have the desired effect in cases where DT is built
> > into the kernel but not in use on the current system (which is a
> > configuration that gets used) ...
>
> The solution to that particular aspect of the problem is the following:
>
> if (of_have_populated_dt()) {
> ...
>
Turns out that won't help either after Mark's patches to ACPI and
to the regulator core are applied. Right now I don't have a solution
that would work for all systems.
I'll leave it up to Jean to decide how to proceed.
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists