[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1390864354.20150.57.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:12:34 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Stepan Moskovchenko <stepanm@...eaurora.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
Ryan Mallon <rmallon@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vsprintf: BUG on %n
On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 15:03 -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> Now that there has been a full release of the kernel, and all users
> of %n have been dropped, switch to %n use triggering a BUG. Ignoring
> arguments could be used to assist in information leaks if an arbitrary
> format string was under the control of an attacker.
[]
> diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
[]
> @@ -1735,15 +1735,12 @@ int vsnprintf(char *buf, size_t size, const char *fmt, va_list args)
> case FORMAT_TYPE_NRCHARS: {
> /*
> * Since %n poses a greater security risk than
> - * utility, ignore %n and skip its argument.
> + * utility, it should not be implemented. Instead,
> + * BUG when encountering %n, since there are no
> + * legitimate users and skipping arguments could
> + * assist information leak attacks.
> */
> - void *skip_arg;
> -
> - WARN_ONCE(1, "Please remove ignored %%n in '%s'\n",
> - old_fmt);
> -
> - skip_arg = va_arg(args, void *);
> - break;
> + BUG();
BUGs should be avoided where possible.
I think using BUG here isn't necessary or good.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists