| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <52E916BC.5040906@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:57:00 +0200
From: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
To: Christoph Fritz <chf.fritz@...glemail.com>
CC: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <pali.rohar@...il.com>,
<pavel@....cz>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
Subject: Re: OMAP: clock DT conversion issues with omap36xx
On 01/29/2014 01:21 PM, Christoph Fritz wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 18:02 +0100, Christoph Fritz wrote:
>> On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 15:40 +0200, Tero Kristo wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Due to a regression since next-20140122 the following errors are present:
>>>>>
>>>>> - pin sys_clkout2, which gets configured to 24 Mhz by the fourth patch
>>>>> in this set, erroneously outputs only 12 Mhz.
>>>>> Just out of curiosity, configuring it to 48 Mhz puts out desired 24 Mhz.
>>>>>
>>>>> - omap_dss, which gets configured by the third patch in this set, fails
>>>>> to do 'dss_set_fck_rate(fck);' in
>>>>> drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.c:dss_setup_default_clock() which leads to:
>>>>>
>>>>> | omapdss_dss: probe of omapdss_dss failed with error -22
>>>>> | omapdss CORE error: Failed to initialize DSS platform driver
>>>>> | panel-dpi panel-dpi.0: failed to find video source 'dpi.0
>>>>>
>>>>> Both regressions seem to have something to do with the clock framework.
>>>>> Could this be related to the DT clock conversion patches?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yea its definitely possible, as the clock DT conversion touches pretty
>>> much everything. Have you tried whether this works properly with legacy
>>> boot? Personally I don't have access to any omap3 devices that would
>>> have display and have no possibility to check this out myself. Anyway,
>>> my initial guess is that some clock divider setup might be wrong with
>>> omap3, or we are missing some ti,set-rate-parent flag for some clock
>>> node which prevents escalating clk_set_rate properly. However, it should
>>> be easy to debug this by looking at the clock node in question, and its
>>> parent nodes to see if there are any problems.
>>
>> Currently I only analyzed sys_clkout2 (see attachments for full
>> clk_summary files):
>>
>> clk_summary__next-20140115__works_as_expected:
>> dpll4_m2_ck 1 1 96000000
>> dpll4_m2x2_ck 1 1 96000000
>> omap_192m_alwon_fck 1 1 96000000
>> omap_96m_alwon_fck 1 2 96000000
>> per_96m_fck 0 6 96000000
>> mcbsp4_fck 0 1 96000000
>> mcbsp3_fck 0 2 96000000
>> mcbsp2_fck 0 2 96000000
>> cm_96m_fck 2 3 96000000
>> clkout2_src_ck 1 1 96000000
>> sys_clkout2 1 1 24000000
>>
>> For real, on pin sys_clkout2 are correctly 24 Mhz measured.
>>
>> clk_summary__next-20140124__sysclkout2_dss_fails:
>> dpll4_m2_ck 1 1 96000000
>> dpll4_m2x2_mul_ck 1 1 192000000
>> dpll4_m2x2_ck 1 1 192000000
>> omap_192m_alwon_fck 0 0 192000000
>> omap_96m_alwon_fck 1 2 192000000
>> per_96m_fck 0 6 192000000
>> mcbsp4_fck 0 1 192000000
>> mcbsp3_fck 0 2 192000000
>> mcbsp2_fck 0 2 192000000
>> cm_96m_fck 2 3 192000000
>> clkout2_src_ck 1 1 192000000
>> sys_clkout2 1 1 24000000
>>
>> For real, on pin sys_clkout2 are only ~12 Mhz measured.
>>
>> So I added this patch:
>>
>> Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: fix omap3 clock multiplier for dpll4_m2x2_ck
>>
>> Before DT clock conversion, there was no multiplier for dpll4_m2x2_ck.
>> So to be compatible again, set dpll4_m2x2_mul_ck multiplier back to 1.
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3xxx-clocks.dtsi | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3xxx-clocks.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3xxx-clocks.dtsi
>> index cb04d4b..b594050 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3xxx-clocks.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3xxx-clocks.dtsi
>> @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@
>> #clock-cells = <0>;
>> compatible = "fixed-factor-clock";
>> clocks = <&dpll4_m2_ck>;
>> - clock-mult = <2>;
>> + clock-mult = <1>;
>> clock-div = <1>;
>> };
>>
>> And it works again. But due to the fact that sys_clkout2 was at 12 Mhz
>> instead of 24, shouldn't it have been at 48 caused by "clock-mult = 2 ?
>
> Any ideas on that?
>
> I reverted the patch above and added:
Hmm, well, the omap96m_alwon_fck rate is still wrong. Try adding
ti,min-div = <2>; and ti,max-div = <4>; to properties of the clock node.
-Tero
>
> From: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
> Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 11:03:46 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: omap36xx: fix omap96m_alwon_fck
>
> OMAP36xx has different hardware implementation for the omap96m_alwon_fck
> compared to other OMAP3 variants. Reflect this properly in the dts file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx-clocks.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx-clocks.dtsi
> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx-clocks.dtsi
> index 2fcf253..24ddf3f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx-clocks.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx-clocks.dtsi
> @@ -88,3 +88,12 @@
> <&mcbsp4_ick>, <&uart4_fck>;
> };
> };
> +
> +&omap_96m_alwon_fck {
> + compatible = "ti,divider-clock";
> + clocks = <&omap_192m_alwon_fck>;
> + ti,bit-shift = <12>;
> + ti,max-div = <2>;
> + reg = <0x0a40>;
> + ti,index-starts-at-one;
> +};
>
> But the output of sys_clkout2 is still wrong.
>
> clk_summary__next-20140124__patch_tero_fix_omap96m_alwon_fck
> dpll4_m2_ck 1 1 96000000
> dpll4_m2x2_mul_ck 1 1 192000000
> dpll4_m2x2_ck 1 1 192000000
> omap_192m_alwon_fck 1 1 192000000
> omap_96m_alwon_fck 1 2 192000000
> per_96m_fck 0 6 192000000
> mcbsp4_fck 0 1 192000000
> mcbsp3_fck 0 2 192000000
> mcbsp2_fck 0 2 192000000
> cm_96m_fck 2 3 192000000
> clkout2_src_ck 1 1 192000000
> sys_clkout2 1 1 24000000
>
> Thanks
> -- Christoph
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists