[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52E94DE6.9050806@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 20:52:22 +0200
From: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>
To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
CC: "linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pali.rohar@...il.com, pavel@....cz,
chf.fritz@...glemail.com, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>, nm@...com
Subject: Re: [BISECTED] OMAP: DSS: clk rate mismatch
On 29.01.2014 13:30, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 2014-01-28 20:17, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 28.01.2014 10:48, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>>
>>> I made a somewhat hacky quickfix for beagle. Applying that and the
>>> clk-divider from the link above makes things work for me. However, as I
>>> said, the issue with n900 might be different, but it'd be interesting to
>>> hear if it has any effect.
>>>
>>> Tomi
>>>
>>
>> Applying those 2 patches doesn't help, still get exactly the same warning.
>>
>> Find attached my clk_summary (with my hacky patch applied, otherwise I
>> cannot boot the device)
>
> Can you try this one:
>
> From e511789f7be00beeeee0712910c60a57c51b2705 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
> Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:28:53 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] clkoutx2 fix
>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock3xxx_data.c | 7 +++++++
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
Yep, that one fixes the problem. Thanks!
Now I only need to find why maemo is 10 times slower with linux-next
compared to 3.13-rc7, but that is another story :).
Ivo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists