[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52E87780.1040002@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 11:37:36 +0800
From: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] cgroup: fix locking in cgroup_cfts_commit()
On 2014/1/28 23:32, Tejun Heo wrote:
> cgroup_cfts_commit() walks the cgroup hierarchy that the target
> subsystem is attached to and tries to apply the file changes. Due to
> the convolution with inode locking, it can't keep cgroup_mutex locked
> while iterating. It currently holds only RCU read lock around the
> actual iteration and then pins the found cgroup using dget().
>
> Unfortunately, this is incorrect. Although the iteration does check
> cgroup_is_dead() before invoking dget(), there's nothing which
> prevents the dentry from going away inbetween. Note that this is
> different from the usual css iterations where css_tryget() is used to
> pin the css - css_tryget() tests whether the css can be pinned and
> fails if not.
>
> The problem can be solved by simply holding cgroup_mutex instead of
> RCU read lock around the iteration, which actually reduces LOC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Good catch!
Acked-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists