[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52E87D64.30800@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 12:02:44 +0800
From: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] cgroup: move the one-off opts sanity check in cgroup_root_from_opts()
to parse_cgroupfs_options()
On 2014/1/28 23:32, Tejun Heo wrote:
> cgroup_root_from_opts() checks whether (!opts->subsys_mask &&
> !opts->none) and returns NULL if so. After that, if allocation fails,
> returns ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM). The caller, cgroup_mount(), doesn't treat
> NULL as an error but set opts.new_root to NULL; however, later on,
> cgroup_set_super() fails with -EINVAL if new_root is NULL.
This patch changes mount semantics.
If cgroup_root_from_opts() returns NULL, it means we should be looking
for existing superblock only.
This will fail:
# mount -t cgroup -o name=abc xxx /mnt
But this is ok:
# mount -t cgroup -o none,name=abc xxx /mnt
# mkdir /mnt/sub
# umount /mnt
# mount -t cgroup -o name=abc xxx /mnt <-- this won't work with your patch
>
> This is one bizarre error handling sequence especially when all other
> opts sanity checks including the very close (!opts->subsys_mask &&
> !opts->name) check are done in parse_cgroupfs_options().
>
> Let's move the one-off check in cgroup_root_from_opts() to
> parse_cgroupfs_options() where it can be combined with the
> (!opts->subsys_mask && !opts->name) check. cgroup_root_from_opts() is
> updated to return NULL on memory allocation failure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists