[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANk1AXS9fbNafLxiUz8OoPVUtwPDhHhYx7+MGi_JyDdG6J9F-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 15:15:11 -0600
From: delicious quinoa <delicious.quinoa@...il.com>
To: Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Alan Tull <atull@...era.com>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...era.com>,
Yves Vandervennet <rocket.yvanderv@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9] gpio: add a driver for Synopsys DesignWare APB GPIO
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Steffen Trumtrar
<s.trumtrar@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 01:40:04PM -0600, delicious quinoa wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Steffen Trumtrar
>> <s.trumtrar@...gutronix.de> wrote:
>>
>> > Second: The interrupt is registered as "GIC 37", which is a real interrupt on
>> > the Socfpga. I would expect it to be marked as "GPIO 2xx" (or something in that
>> > range). The interrupt from the gpiochip itself isn't registered at all ?!
>>
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> Did you export the gpio lines and set the edge in sysfs? Because the
>> interrupts aren't allocated otherwise.
>>
>> For instance:
>>
>> root@...fpga_cyclone5:~# echo 195 > /sys/class/gpio/export
>> root@...fpga_cyclone5:~# echo rising > /sys/class/gpio/gpio195/edge
>>
>> Now I can see a pretty nicely named interrupt in /proc/interrupts:
>>
>> 256: 0 0 gpio-dwapb 24 gpiolib
>>
>
> I didn't try that and I think this behaviour is pretty uncommon.
> This should be fixed in the driver. I never wrote a gpiochip-driver,
> so I don't know what is missing, but maybe just some functioncall ?!
> All other drivers I came across have that entry from probing without
> any fiddling.
Hi Steffen,
Do you mean 'all other gpio drivers' or 'all other non-gpio drivers'?
This is the behavior that is implemented in the community gpio
framework drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c, not anything special implemented in
this dw gpio driver.
It's documented in Documentation/gpio/sysfs.txt and
Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-gpio.
You get userspace control of a gpio by 'export'ing it in sysfs. And
then by default, the interrupt edge is set to 'none' (no irq) until
you set the edge in sysfs.
Alan
>
> Thanks,
> Steffen
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | |
> Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
> Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists