lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 30 Jan 2014 21:50:00 +0100
From:	Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@...gutronix.de>
To:	delicious quinoa <delicious.quinoa@...il.com>
Cc:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Alan Tull <atull@...era.com>,
	Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...era.com>,
	Yves Vandervennet <rocket.yvanderv@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9] gpio: add a driver for Synopsys DesignWare APB GPIO

Hi!

On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 01:40:04PM -0600, delicious quinoa wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Steffen Trumtrar
> <s.trumtrar@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> 
> > Second: The interrupt is registered as "GIC 37", which is a real interrupt on
> > the Socfpga. I would expect it to be marked as "GPIO 2xx" (or something in that
> > range). The interrupt from the gpiochip itself isn't registered at all ?!
> 
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> Did you export the gpio lines and set the edge in sysfs?  Because the
> interrupts aren't allocated otherwise.
> 
> For instance:
> 
> root@...fpga_cyclone5:~# echo 195 > /sys/class/gpio/export
> root@...fpga_cyclone5:~# echo rising > /sys/class/gpio/gpio195/edge
> 
> Now I can see a pretty nicely named interrupt in /proc/interrupts:
> 
> 256:          0          0  gpio-dwapb  24  gpiolib
> 

I didn't try that and I think this behaviour is pretty uncommon.
This should be fixed in the driver. I never wrote a gpiochip-driver,
so I don't know what is missing, but maybe just some functioncall ?!
All other drivers I came across have that entry from probing without
any fiddling.

Thanks,
Steffen

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ