linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] net: core: move core networking work to power efficient workqueue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1391129701.2422.75.camel@joe-AO722>
Date:	Thu, 30 Jan 2014 16:55:01 -0800
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Antonio Quartulli <antonio@...hcoding.com>
Cc:	Zoran Markovic <zoran.markovic@...aro.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] net: core: move core networking work to power
 efficient workqueue

On Fri, 2014-01-31 at 01:48 +0100, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> On 31/01/14 01:33, Zoran Markovic wrote:
> > From: Shaibal Dutta <shaibal.dutta@...adcom.com>
> 
> [...]
> 
> > -		schedule_delayed_work(&linkwatch_work, delay);
> > +		queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq,
> > +			&linkwatch_work, delay);
> 
> before talking about technical details, here and in other spots of this
> patch the alignment is wrong. I think checkpatch should have said
> something about it. The first parameter on the new line should be
> aligned up to the column after the opening parenthesis.

Using "scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict" would emit an
alignment message, otherwise not.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/