[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqKkBnj9w0pMtQOGYvNmAYpwKO4U3hjzoLBiiVab7vBmkw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 16:12:10 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] ARM: rockchip: add smp functionality
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de> wrote:
> On Monday, 20. January 2014 16:41:43 Heiko Stübner wrote:
>> This series enables the use of the additional cores on Rockchip
>> Cortex-A9 SoCs.
>
> So, two weeks without any general complaints, but I guess part of the more
> general patches could use an ack.
>
> Going forward, what would be best way to merge them?
> As one pull request to arm-soc, or for example splitting them into the first
> three patches going through the misc tree and the rockchip specific stuff going
> through arm-soc? Or something else altogether?
>
>
>> Heiko Stuebner (7):
>> of: add functions to count number of elements in a property
>
> One of the intermediate versions of this patch got a
> Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> .
> Mark, is this still true for this variant addressing some additional wished
> from Rob?
>
> And this final version got a "Looks good" from Rob Herring in the original
> thread, but a more formal "ack" might be nice :-) .
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Rob
>
>
>> dt-bindings: sram: describe option to reserve parts of the memory
>> misc: sram: implement mmio-sram-reserved option
>
> Philipp, you acked an intermediate version, and this v7 now should also
> contain the two separate loops (1st gathering data and 2nd creating the pool
> parts) you asked for.
>
> Could I persuade you to take a look again?
>
>
> Thanks
> Heiko
>
>
>> ARM: rockchip: add snoop-control-unit
>> ARM: rockchip: add sram dt nodes and documentation
>> ARM: rockchip: add power-management-unit
>> ARM: rockchip: add smp bringup code
>>
>> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip/pmu.txt | 16 ++
>> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip/smp-sram.txt | 23 +++
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/sram.txt | 8 +
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3066a.dtsi | 6 +
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3188.dtsi | 6 +
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3xxx.dtsi | 10 +
>> arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Kconfig | 1 +
>> arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Makefile | 1 +
>> arch/arm/mach-rockchip/core.h | 22 +++
>> arch/arm/mach-rockchip/headsmp.S | 30 +++
>> arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c | 208
>> ++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rockchip.c |
>> 2 +
>> drivers/misc/sram.c | 121 +++++++++++-
>> drivers/of/base.c | 32 +++
>> include/linux/of.h | 76 +++++++
>> 15 files changed, 554 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip/pmu.txt
>> create mode 100644
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip/smp-sram.txt create mode
>> 100644 arch/arm/mach-rockchip/core.h
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-rockchip/headsmp.S
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists