linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] ARM: rockchip: add smp functionality

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 1 Feb 2014 22:51:40 +0100
From:	Philipp Zabel <pza@...gutronix.de>
To:	Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc:	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, arm@...nel.org,
	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] ARM: rockchip: add smp functionality

Hi Heiko,

On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 11:03:03PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> On Monday, 20. January 2014 16:41:43 Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > This series enables the use of the additional cores on Rockchip
> > Cortex-A9 SoCs.
> 
> So, two weeks without any general complaints, but I guess part of the more 
> general patches could use an ack.
> 
> Going forward, what would be best way to merge them?
> As one pull request to arm-soc, or for example splitting them into the first 
> three patches going through the misc tree and the rockchip specific stuff going 
> through arm-soc? Or something else altogether?
> 
> 
> > Heiko Stuebner (7):
> >   of: add functions to count number of elements in a property
> 
> One of the intermediate versions of this patch got a
> 	Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> .
> Mark, is this still true for this variant addressing some additional wished 
> from Rob?
> 
> And this final version got a "Looks good" from Rob Herring in the original 
> thread, but a more formal "ack" might be nice :-) .
> 
> 
> >   dt-bindings: sram: describe option to reserve parts of the memory
> >   misc: sram: implement mmio-sram-reserved option
> 
> Philipp, you acked an intermediate version, and this v7 now should also 
> contain the two separate loops (1st gathering data and 2nd creating the pool 
> parts) you asked for.
> 
> Could I persuade you to take a look again?

Acked-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>

regards
Philipp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/