[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1401310316560.21451@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 03:20:17 -0500 (EST)
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"Alasdair G. Kergon" <agk@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <msnitzer@...hat.com>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block devices: validate block device capacity
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, James Bottomley wrote:
> > So, if you want 64-bit page offsets, you need to increase pgoff_t size,
> > and that will increase the limit for both files and block devices.
>
> No. The point is the page cache mapping of the device uses a
> manufactured inode saved in the backing device. It looks fixable in the
> buffer code before the page cache gets involved.
So if you think you can support 16TiB devices and leave pgoff_t 32-bit,
send a patch that does it.
Until you make it, you should apply the patch that I sent, that prevents
kernel lockups or data corruption when the user uses 16TiB device on
32-bit kernel.
Mikulas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists