linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] block devices: validate block device capacity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 3 Feb 2014 00:15:06 -0800
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Cc:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	"Alasdair G. Kergon" <agk@...hat.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <msnitzer@...hat.com>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block devices: validate block device capacity

On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 03:20:17AM -0500, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> So if you think you can support 16TiB devices and leave pgoff_t 32-bit, 
> send a patch that does it.
> 
> Until you make it, you should apply the patch that I sent, that prevents 
> kernel lockups or data corruption when the user uses 16TiB device on 
> 32-bit kernel.

Exactly.  I had actually looked into support for > 16TiB devices for
a NAS use case a while ago, but when explaining the effort involves
the idea was dropped quickly.  The Linux block device is too deeply
tied to the pagecache to make it easily feasible.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/