[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140203113900.GD1725@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 12:39:01 +0100
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: protect pinctrl_list add
We have few fedora bug reports about list corruption on pinctrl,
for example:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051918
Most likely corruption happen due lack of protection of pinctrl_list
when adding new nodes to it. Patch corrects that.
Fixes: 57b676f9c1b ("pinctrl: fix and simplify locking")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
---
I only compile tested patch, also did not get test results from bug
reporters yet. But I'm pretty confident that patch fixes the problem
and does not cause any other deadlock.
drivers/pinctrl/core.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/core.c b/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
index 5ee61a4..cab020a 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
@@ -851,7 +851,9 @@ static struct pinctrl *create_pinctrl(struct device *dev)
kref_init(&p->users);
/* Add the pinctrl handle to the global list */
+ mutex_lock(&pinctrl_list_mutex);
list_add_tail(&p->node, &pinctrl_list);
+ mutex_unlock(&pinctrl_list_mutex);
return p;
}
--
1.7.11.7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists