[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52F00653.40802@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 14:12:51 -0700
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: protect pinctrl_list add
On 02/03/2014 04:39 AM, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> We have few fedora bug reports about list corruption on pinctrl,
> for example:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051918
>
> Most likely corruption happen due lack of protection of pinctrl_list
> when adding new nodes to it. Patch corrects that.
>
> Fixes: 57b676f9c1b ("pinctrl: fix and simplify locking")
After that patch ...
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/core.c b/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
> @@ -851,7 +851,9 @@ static struct pinctrl *create_pinctrl(struct device *dev)
> kref_init(&p->users);
>
> /* Add the pinctrl handle to the global list */
> + mutex_lock(&pinctrl_list_mutex);
That variable doesn't exist; it got replaced with the "global"
pinctrl_mutex. Also, since that patch, IIRC some other changes have been
made to the locking structure, so this patch might need adjustments not
to conflict with those changes?
> list_add_tail(&p->node, &pinctrl_list);
> + mutex_unlock(&pinctrl_list_mutex);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists