[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52F12406.4020405@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 09:31:50 -0800
From: "Kamble, Nitin A" <nitin.a.kamble@...el.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irq: fix a Kconfig dependency
On 1/31/2014 9:44 AM, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
>
> On 1/31/2014 2:27 AM, David Rientjes wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, nitin.a.kamble@...el.com wrote:
>>
>>> From: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@...el.com>
>>>
>>> The generic_chip.c uses interfaces from irq_domain.c which is
>>> controlled by
>>> the IRQ_DOMAIN config option.
>>>
>>> Add a select statement in the Kconfig to reflect this requirement.
>>>
>>> Without this fix, the generic_chip.c compilation fails like this:
>>>
>>> linux/kernel/irq/generic-chip.c:400:11:
>>> error: 'irq_domain_xlate_onetwocell' undeclared here (not in a
>>> function)
>>>
>> You're not specifying which config option you have enabled that selects
>> CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP and does not select CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN, but it
>> does
>> look like there is a dependency here.
> It is enabled by GPIO_PCH as seen here:
>
> config GPIO_PCH
> tristate "Intel EG20T PCH/LAPIS Semiconductor
> IOH(ML7223/ML7831) GPIO"
> depends on PCI && X86
> select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP
> help
> This driver is for PCH(Platform controller Hub) GPIO of
> Intel Topcliff
> which is an IOH(Input/Output Hub) for x86 embedded processor.
> This driver can access PCH GPIO device.
>
>>
>> So, if this dependency is reasonable, it begs the question of why we
>> have
>> CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP at all and shouldn't just make generic-chip.c
>> depend on CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN.
> Looking at the code there are cases where IRQ_DOMAIN functionality is
> used
> without using the GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP. So making generic-chip.c depend
> on CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN in the makefile will reduce the flexibility of using
> these config options separately.
>
> Nitin
>
>
Hi David, Thomas,
Is there any more feedback for this fix? Currently kernel is not
building for the
affected platform without this fix. and I am happy to help here to get
the fix
pulled in sooner. Let me know.
Thanks,
Nitin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists