[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140204200018.GZ22609@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 20:00:18 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@...o.se>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: Make regulator object reflect
configured voltage
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 11:09:03AM -0800, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> I have a regulator that's being configured from DT as:
> regulator-min-microvolt = <2950000>;
> regulator-max-microvolt = <2950000>;
> In the consumer I do regulator_set_voltage(2.95V).
> As min == max the voltage is applied by the regulator framework on registration
> of the regulator; and the regulator_set_voltage() fails as
> REGULATOR_CHANGE_VOLTAGE is not set for this regulator.
So we should be changing the code to allow a set_voltage() that sets the
voltage to the existing voltage regardless of constraints allowing a
change then - that's what the underlying issue is. Your change wouldn't
cover the case where the hardware defualt is being used for example.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists