[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140204210733.36c2eab0@skate>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 21:07:33 +0100
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] clk: mvebu: fix clk init order
Hello,
On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 15:58:44 +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> > @Jason, Andrew, Gregory, Thomas:
> > Now that v3.14 is out, anything against taking this in as fixes for rc1?
>
> I am not found of this solution I still think it should be done
> at framework level. However we still have this very annoying issue,
> and this fix is better than nothing. So I am not against taking this
> for rc1 with the hope that it will be later revert with a better
> solution.
Same opinion here. I'm fine with this solution as a temporary measure,
but it would be good to solve this problem in a nicer way. Also, making
this change doesn't impact the DT in any way, there is no problem in
having a temporary not perfect solution, and improve it later on.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists