lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 05 Feb 2014 13:49:34 +0100
From:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To:	Jenny Tc <jenny.tc@...el.com>
Cc:	MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
	Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/18] charger: max14577: Add support for MAX77836 charger

Hi,

On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 17:00 +0530, Jenny Tc wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 01:18:40PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > -	/* Battery-Charger Constant Voltage (CV) Mode, from SM-V700: 4.35V */
> > +	/* Battery-Charger Constant Voltage (CV) Mode, set to: 4.35V */
> 
> Does this charger chip support only 4.35V batteries? If the CV is hard coded
> to 4.35V, it's not safe for 4.2V batteries.
> 
> > +	/* End-of-Charge Current, set to 50mA (max14577) / 7.5mA (max77836) */
> The End of charge current basically depend on battery and not on charger chip.
> 
> > -	/* Overvoltage-Protection Threshold, from SM-V700: 6.5V */
> > +	/* Overvoltage-Protection Threshold, set to 6.5V */
> 6.5V as over voltage for battery? A 4.35V battery would have exploded by
> that time!

Currently the max14577 driver has all these values hard-coded. This
patch doesn't change this, it only adds support for max77836. I agree
with you that hard-coding these values is not a proper way of doing
this.

I'll add another patch for parsing these values from DTS.

Best regards,
Krzysztof



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ