lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1676482.sbjAhaSLaV@dizzy-6.o2s.ch>
Date:	Wed, 05 Feb 2014 14:01:33 +0100
From:	David Lanzendörfer <david.lanzendoerfer@....ch>
To:	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
	Simon Baatz <gmbnomis@...il.com>,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
	linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] ARM: sunxi: Add driver for SD/MMC hosts found on allwinner sunxi SOCs

Hi Maxime
> I have four comments here:
>   - Read Documentation/SubmittingPatches, especially Section 5 and 12
>     (hints, you forgot the clock maintainers for your clock patches
>     and you didn't put any signed-off-by tags)
Oops. I added signed-offs now
>   - You ignored pretty much all the comments that were made during the
>     review of the first version. Go through
Uh? I just fixed the commits and squashed them together for easier handling.
I'm even using mmc_of_parse now...
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-December/219339.
> html and address the comments that were made.
>   - Each of your patches should compile. Fix the order of your
>     patches.
Done.
>   - Submit a v3, with the changes you made. Otherwise we have no way
>     of knowing what have been fixed and what didn't
Too many patches would be bloaty.
That's why I've squashed them into small and corrected patches.

> Looking forward for the next iteration!
Good :-)
You can have a look at the recent status here:
http://git.o2s.ch/?p=linux-next.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/20140205

cheers
David
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ