linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 59/73] drivers/gpio: delete non-required instances of include <linux/init.h>

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdYF2f1Ekp6JYwntj+UhbceWtMN==yKC7emsXHfktcZZsg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 5 Feb 2014 14:02:52 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 59/73] drivers/gpio: delete non-required instances of
 include <linux/init.h>

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:21 AM, Paul Gortmaker
<paul.gortmaker@...driver.com> wrote:

> For what it is worth, I'm not removing any patches from my series file
> until they explicitly conflict and/or become redundant.  If a maintainer
> says they are adding the patch, I add a comment in the series file, but
> I don't remove them until I see them come into next via another branch,
> and/or sfr reports a conflict/redundancy.

So I can add these patches to my devel branches now I think?

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/