linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net: use __GFP_NORETRY for high order allocations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140206.222932.292588043950970246.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 06 Feb 2014 22:29:32 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, rientjes@...gle.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: use __GFP_NORETRY for high order allocations

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 10:42:42 -0800

> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> 
> sock_alloc_send_pskb() & sk_page_frag_refill()
> have a loop trying high order allocations to prepare
> skb with low number of fragments as this increases performance.
> 
> Problem is that under memory pressure/fragmentation, this can
> trigger OOM while the intent was only to try the high order
> allocations, then fallback to order-0 allocations.
> 
> We had various reports from unexpected regressions.
> 
> According to David, setting __GFP_NORETRY should be fine,
> as the asynchronous compaction is still enabled, and this
> will prevent OOM from kicking as in :
 ...
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>

Applied, do we want this for -stable?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/